Legal Opinion
William E. "Buster" Fisher v. Tom E. Harden, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Morrow County, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2005No. 02-3996PublishedCited by 181 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff-Appellant, William E. “Buster” Fisher, filed a complaint on December 4, 2000, in which, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, he charged the Defendants-Appellees, Sheriff Tom E. Harden, Deputy Stephen Alexander, Deputy Molly Alexander, and Deputy Mark Leary (collectively “the Defendants”), with having violated his right against an unreasonable seizure as guaranteed by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. On May 9, 2002, the Defendants filed a joint motion for summary judgment. The district court subsequently issued an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Miller v. Sanilac CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Richard Wesley v. Alison CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Phillips v. Community Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Savoie v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.