Legal Opinion

United States v. Clarence J. Hobbs

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 22, 1993No. 92-8380PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Clarence Hobbs received a four-month sentence in a halfway house, followed by a three-year probation, for one count of bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Later, Hobbs violated the terms of his probation. After a hearing, the district court resen-tenced Hobbs to six months’ imprisonment, followed by a two-year term of supervised release. Hobbs appeals, arguing that the district court had no authority to include a supervised release period after the revocation of probation.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a)(2), if a defendant violates a probation condition, the district court may revoke probation…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas L. MarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Bobby E. WesleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Gary MitsvenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. HarrisonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  5. United States v. Tony McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API