Legal Opinion · Concurrence

English v. Ricart

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 2006No. S05A1858Published

1ConcurrenceCarley, Justice

I concur fully in the affirmance of the probate court’s holding that Ms. Ricart’s assent to the probate of her late husband’s will did not constitute a waiver of her right to an intestate share of his estate. I do not, however, agree with the majority’s reason for reaching that conclusion.

According to the majority, the probate court did not err “under the facts of this case in which the will had not yet been admitted to probate. . . .” P. 216. Thus, the majority notes that it does

not reach the issue of whether an after-married spouse who assents to the probate of a will in solemn form retains…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Underwriters Insurance v. NolesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FreelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Kemp v. City of ClaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Sutton v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Cross v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API