Cavanaugh v. Wholey
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The suit was brought to quiet title to the southeast quarter of section 29 of the township described in the complaint. The plaintiff deraigns title under a patent from the United States to the Central Pacific Railroad Company, of date July 27, 1895, and a deed, of date July 27, 1899, from the grantee to plaintiff, based on a contract of sale to Joseph Cavanaugh, deceased, of date July 22, 1889; in which year, and presumably before the date mentioned, the title of the railroad company became vested by the location of its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jatunn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ventre v. TiscorniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Matteodo v. RicciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1936
- Matteodo v. RicciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1936
- Matteodo v. RicciSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 1934