Hill v. Agnew
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
Since the demurrer to the answer was not passed upon by the court below, no ruling is here made as to the sufficiency of the answer to set up facts authorizing a reformation' of the deed because of a “mutual mistake” in its execution; but the answer, which constitutes a part of the evidence, must be considered along with other evidence in determining whether the court abused its discretion in denying an interlocutory injunction.
The burden of the argument advanced by counsel for the plaintiff in error is that in this case there is an insufficient showing of diligence on the part…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dover v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Weaver v. RobersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Wyche v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Steadham v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- J. D. Jewell, Inc. v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Fox v. WashburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Lindsey v. GuhlSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- LYNCH CORPORATION v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.