Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. City of Loving
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1977No. 2897PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERNANDEZ, Judge.
This case involves an appeal and a cross appeal. The second point of error on the cross appeal is dispositive of the matter.
The plaintiffs sued the defendants for the wrongful destruction of their buildings and contents and the consequent interruption of their business. The jury returned a verdict in their favor against the City of Loving and James Williams. The defendant Dale Hamilton was dismissed from the suit by order of the Court on an issue which will be discussed later.
On February 28, 1974, Hamilton, (an employee of the City of Loving) while acting under orders,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Alameda v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McLain v. HaleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Cortesy v. Territory of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pierce v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Century Bank v. HymansNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.