Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Executive Excellence, LLC v. Martin Bros. Investments, LLC

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 30, 2011No. A10A1745, A10A2143, A10A2144Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent as to Divisions 1 (b) (ii) and 2 of the majority opinion. I otherwise concur fully in the rest of the opinion.

1. Contrary to the majority’s view, I believe that the record evidence supports a valid slander of title claim and precludes the entry of summary judgment based upon the April and October statements made by the agent for Southern Tradition and Martin Brothers to third parties.

Under OCGA § 51-9-11, “[t]he owner of any estate in lands may bring an action for libelous or slanderous words which falsely and maliciously impugn his title if any damage accrues to him…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Webster v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Premier Cabinets, Inc. v. BulatCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API