Legal Opinion
Christine Roth Melo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1974No. 74-1169PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is a timely appeal by plaintiff Christine Roth Melo from final order sustaining motion as amended, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint by reason of plaintiff’s failure to exhaust available administrative remedies as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2675.
The basic facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff and Richard Dean Dyer, an employee of the United States Post Office, were involved in an automobile collision in Burlington, Iowa on November 1, 1971. The Government concedes that Dyer was acting within the scope of his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Estelle E. Caton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Best Bearings Co., an Illinois Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by William Sheppard, Insurance Commissioner v. National Association of Flood Insurers, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Hilario Molinar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Bellecourt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Jack Steele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.