Cheung v. Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark

Rose, L, with whom Douglas, L, agrees,

dissenting:

The majority opinion has fashioned a result that appears to be both a practical and politically popular solution. Unfortunately, it completely fails to recognize the Nevada Constitution’s unqualified guaranty that “the right of trial by Jury shall be secured to all.”1 The concurring justice who signed the Aftercare decision over a *882year and a half ago with not so much as a murmur of dissent now reaches the opposite conclusion even though both cases involve court procedures in justice courts. Since the majority and concurring opinions seriously…