Windholz v. Willis
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, J.:
This appeal raises the constitutionality of the small claims procedure act (K.S.A. 61-2701 et seq.) as it existed from January 10, 1977, until April 27, 1977. The issue arises because during that period neither party to small claims litigation was entitled to appear by or with counsel at any stage during which evidence was introduced, and no trial by jury was obtainable.
This lawsuit was commenced on November 11, 1976, in the former magistrate court of Reno county. In her petition Mrs. Windholz sought out-of-pocket expenses and compensation for inconvenience and embarrassment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Prudential Insurance Co. v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brooks v. Small Claims CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- First Nat'l Bank of Olathe v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Ben J. v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.