Legal Opinion

Castro-Cortez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2001No. Nos. 99-35314, 99-35511, 99-35786, 99-70267, 99-70357, 99-70474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009-546 (1996) breathed new life into a dormant provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that permitted the INS to reinstate prior orders of removal against aliens who reentered the United States.1 The revised provision, codified at INA § 241(a)(5), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5), not only expands the types of orders subject to reinstatement, but constrains the relief available to aliens whose orders are reinstated. When implementing the revised…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carlos Castro-Cortez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jose Luis Araujo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Francisco Mario Funes-Quevado, A.K.A. Francisco Mario Funes v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Ramon Rueda v. Richard C. Smith, District Director and Janet Reno, Attorney General, Nestor Salinas-Sandoval v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Richard Eugene Smith, and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Rosario Gallo-Alvarez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Rosario Gallo-Alvarez, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert C. Eddy Doris Meissner John Ashcroft, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API