Legal Opinion

Red River Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1939No. 9337, 9339PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

These two suits are for infringement of three patents, all having to do with the production of lubricating oils from petroleum by distillation. They are Nos. 1,448,-709 to Schultze, 2,017,820 to Schultze, and 1,727,380 to Ryder. For convenience they will be discussed as though there was one suit and one plaintiff.

Of the claims in suit 27, 28, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, and 49 of the ’709 patent, 19, 20, 22, 23, and 25 of the ’820 patent, and 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 of the ’380 patent are process claims. 13, 14, 15, 16, and 25 of the ’709…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Floridin Co. v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. National Electric Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  4. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
  5. Pennsylvania Crusher Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API