SmithKline Corp. v. Staats
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
This action arises from a demand asserted by the General Accounting Office (“GAO”) for access to. books and records maintained by the plaintiff SmithKline Corporation (“SmithKline”). Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to bar GAO from access to the documents. The Court granted the motion of the United States to intervene as a party defendant for the purpose of asserting a counterclaim seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to compel SmithKline to comply with GAO’s demand for documents. Now before the Court are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Harry Daniel HICKS, Appellant, v. ABT ASSOCIATES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Sylvester Lockhart, Jr. v. Charles A. Hoenstine, Prothonotary of the Superior Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Scott v. PlanteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, ComptrollerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Bristol Laboratories Division of Bristol-Myers Co. v. StaatsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Smithkline Corporation v. Elmer Staats, Comptroller General of the United States, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bristol Laboratories Division of Bristol-Myers Company v. StaatsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller Merck & Co., Inc. v. Elmer B. Staats, ComptrollerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.