Legal Opinion

Poulos v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1944No. 30668PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The first three assignments of error, (a), (b) and (c), cover the general grounds. The evidence authorized the jury to infer that the defendants were jointly in possession of the lottery paraphernalia contained in the sack. This evidence, in connection with the evidence concerning the method of operating the number game, that it was at that time in operation in Fulton County, and in connection with other evidence, is sufficient to sustain the conviction. Mills v. State, 71 Ga. App. 353 (30 S. E. 2d, 824); Davis v. State, 70 Ga. App. 513 (28 S. E. 2d, 784).(d) This special ground complains…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API