Poulos v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The first three assignments of error, (a), (b) and (c), cover the general grounds. The evidence authorized the jury to infer that the defendants were jointly in possession of the lottery paraphernalia contained in the sack. This evidence, in connection with the evidence concerning the method of operating the number game, that it was at that time in operation in Fulton County, and in connection with other evidence, is sufficient to sustain the conviction. Mills v. State, 71 Ga. App. 353 (30 S. E. 2d, 824); Davis v. State, 70 Ga. App. 513 (28 S. E. 2d, 784).(d) This special ground complains…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951