Boggess v. State

The information charges the plaintiff in error with having received from one Clarence Williams various items of personal property, knowing the same to have been stolen. The case has been well tried both on the part of the state, and the plaintiff in error. Various assignments of error are presented and argued in the briefs; among them the assignment that there is no proof that the plaintiff in error, if he ever received any part of the stolen property in question, received it from 'Clarence Williams, but that, if received at all, it was from one Austin Tillman and Joe Derrick, and from a…