Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Erie Stone Company v. United States of America, Toledo Stone & Glass Sand Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1962No. 14403_1Published

1Dissent

SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Chief Judge

(dissenting).

The evidence in this case supports the finding of the District Judge that the stone deposits quarried by the taxpayers were (with one exception) relatively uniform, sedimentary, carbonate rocks and contained a minimum of 90 per cent of the mineral dolomite. They possessed proximate chemical analyses ranging as follows;

Calcium carbonate .... 52-56 per cent

Magnesium carbonate. .41-45 per cent

Impurities.3 per cent or less

The one exception was the so-called No. 63 stone from the Huntington quarry which possessed a proximate chemical analysis as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. The Wagner Quarries CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Albin C. Halquist and Madeline E. HalquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. Halquist v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Riddell v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Wagner Quarries Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API