The Erie Stone Company v. United States of America, Toledo Stone & Glass Sand Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
SHACKELFORD MILLER, Jr., Chief Judge
(dissenting).
The evidence in this case supports the finding of the District Judge that the stone deposits quarried by the taxpayers were (with one exception) relatively uniform, sedimentary, carbonate rocks and contained a minimum of 90 per cent of the mineral dolomite. They possessed proximate chemical analyses ranging as follows;
Calcium carbonate .... 52-56 per cent
Magnesium carbonate. .41-45 per cent
Impurities.3 per cent or less
The one exception was the so-called No. 63 stone from the Huntington quarry which possessed a proximate chemical analysis as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. The Wagner Quarries CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Albin C. Halquist and Madeline E. HalquistCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Halquist v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Riddell v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Wagner Quarries Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.