Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Albin C. Halquist and Madeline E. Halquist

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1961No. 13107PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are largely stipulated or undisputed. During the taxable years 1951 through 1954, respondents Albín C. Halquist and Madeline E. Halquist, his wife, as a partnership, Halquist Lannon Stone Company (hereinafter called “Halquist”) engaged in the business of removing stone from two quarries in Waukesha County, Wisconsin.

This stone was sold in the form of two products: crushed stone and “dimension” stone 1 of various shapes and sizes. Halquist also bought, processed and sold some dimension stone from other quarries. There was evidence that these stones…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Standard Realization Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  3. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Great Bend Brick & Tele Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Virginia Greenstone Company, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Barton Mines Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Light Aggregates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  4. Riddell v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Morton Salt Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API