Roebuck v. Calhoun
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) "While the judge, upon a hearing of a writ of habeas corpus for the detention of a child, is vested with a discretion in determining to whom its custody shall he given, such discretion should be governed by the rules of law, and be exercised in favor of the party having the legal right, unless the evidence shows that the interest and welfare of the child justify the judge in awarding its custody to •another.” Sloan v. Jones, 130 Ga. 836 (63 S. E. 21). In the present ease the moral fitness of the contending parties was not made an issue in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Chapin v. CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Sloan v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Hill v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Bond v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Miele v. GregorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Heath v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Woods v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Spitz v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.