Legal Opinion
Fertitta v. Bay Shore Development Corp.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 7, 1969No. [No. 19, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This case arises because of an apparent error of the State Roads Commission in that a road near Ocean City was built in a place other than in the location described in the deeds.
Sinepuxent Beach Company of Baltimore City laid out a tract of land north of the former corporate limits of Ocean City. A plat was recorded among the Worcester County land records in 1891. Just prior to World War II the Maryland State Roads Commission (Commission) desired to acquire a 120 foot right-of-way for a road from Ocean City to the Maryland-Delaware State line at Fenwick Island. It is conceded that it was the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brush v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Blondell v. TuroverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Westpark, Inc. v. Seaton Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Smoot v. ReaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
- Lissau v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Geisz v. Greater Baltimore Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Lumsden v. Design Tech Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Booth Glass Co. v. Huntingfield Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Argyrou v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.