Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Barlow

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1985No. 14406Published

1Opinion of the Court

705 P.2d 1056 (1985)

109 Idaho 101

Frances McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross Respondent,

v.

Kimber Ray BARLOW, Defendant-Respondent, Cross Appellant.

No. 14406.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

September 3, 1985.

John C. Hepworth (argued) and John T. Lezamiz, Hepworth, Nungester & Felton, Twin Falls, for plaintiff-appellant, cross respondent.

Roger D. Ling (argued) and Steven Ross, Ling, Nielsen & Robinson, Rupert, for defendant-respondent, cross-appellant.

ON REHEARING

This opinion supercedes our prior opinion issued January 24, 1985, which is hereby withdrawn.

WALTERS, Chief Justice.

Several months after a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Aldape v. AkinsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Compton v. ComptonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Simplot v. SimplotIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Speer v. QuinlanIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API