Legal Opinion
Decker v. Fillis
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 26, 1969No. C 208-69PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
Asserting jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3), (4), 2201, 2202; 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, plaintiff sues here for a declaratory judgment that Salt Lake City Ordinance 32-1-16 is void, and for a permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from exercising any powers, rights or duties respecting its enforcement.
A motion to dismiss filed by the defendants already has been denied. The case comes before me now on the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of answers to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Hayes v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- Rakes v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970
- Farber v. RochfordDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Kirkwood v. LoebDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971