Arenz v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.
In this original proceeding, petitioners challenge a ballot title certified by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State. We review this ballot title for “substantial compliance” with the requirements of ORS 250.035.1 ORS 250.085(4). Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), petitioners filed with the Secretary of State timely written comments concerning the Attorney General’s certified ballot title. Petitioners, therefore, are entitled to bring this proceeding. ORS 250.085(2) and (5).
The Attorney General certified the following ballot title to the Secretary of State:
“AMENDS CONSTITUTION:
LEGAL RIGHTS…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bernard v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993