Legal Opinion

Arenz v. Keisling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1993No. SC S39991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

In this original proceeding, petitioners challenge a ballot title certified by the Attorney General to the Secretary of State. We review this ballot title for “substantial compliance” with the requirements of ORS 250.035.1 ORS 250.085(4). Pursuant to ORS 250.067(1), petitioners filed with the Secretary of State timely written comments concerning the Attorney General’s certified ballot title. Petitioners, therefore, are entitled to bring this proceeding. ORS 250.085(2) and (5).

The Attorney General certified the following ballot title to the Secretary of State:

“AMENDS CONSTITUTION:

LEGAL RIGHTS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernard v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API