Legal Opinion
Pilger v. United States Steel Corp.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 4, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This bill is to compel the United States Steel Corporation to transfer on its books and certify to the complainant five hundred shares of its stock now outstanding in the name of Shearson, Hammill Company, New York stockbrokers, represented by fifty ten-share certificates, serially numbered, each having thereon, duly endorsed, an assignment in blank, with power to transfer. The Public Trustee of England holds the certificates, they having been seized as enemy property during the war, and he prays by answer (it should be by counter-claim) that the shares be transferred to him.
Before the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Plimpton v. . BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Direction Der Disconto-Gesellschaft v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. City of ClarksdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Simpson v. . Jersey City Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Mylander v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Amm v. AmmNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Seymour v. National Biscuit Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- First Nat. Bank, Fort Lee v. EnglewoodNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.