Legal Opinion

Houston River Canal Co. v. Kopke

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1901No. 13,932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Fifteenth Judicial District, Parish of Calcasieu. — Miller, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement op the Case.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Monroe, J.

The petition filed in this case alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff, through its duly authorized general manager, Samuel A. Robertson, entered into a verbal contract with the firm of “Kopke, *610Robicheaux & Nichols,” composed of L. J*. Kopke, M. Robicheaux and Nichols, whereby the latter agreed to plant in rice, during the year 1900, certain tracts of land in the Parish of Calcasieu, and whereby the petitioner agreed to furnish the water necessary for the irrigation of such rice, and that, in consideration thereof,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Whitehead v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Marx Levy & Bro.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Crespo v. ViolaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Markham Irr. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Carlile v. KimbroughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Chadick-Hayes Provision Co. v. Pine Grove Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API