Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Marx Levy & Bro.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 15, 1902No. 14,199PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. xlction by Emmanuel Johnson against Marx Levy & Bro. and. others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

Plaintiff is the holder of a promissory note for $4,000.00 and interest, executed in June, 1898, by Joseph Weil & Co., made payable to their own order and due one year after date.

The note is endorsed in blank by the, makers and also by Marx Levy & Bro,

The endorsement of the latter firm’s name is by Armand Levy — thus “Marx Levy & Bro., p. Armand Levy.”

The note was acquired by plaintiff before' its maturity and the consideration of its transfer to him by Joseph Weil & Co. was an indebtedness of $1,000.00 for loaned money which the firm owed him and which had matured, and a further loan of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. New York & New Haven Railroad v. SchuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Bank of Monongahela Valley v. . WestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Pruyn v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  5. Williams v. Gilkeson-Sloss Commission Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Farley v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  2. Loomis v. ChurchIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Johnson v. HunterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API