Fisk v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Western District of Tennessee; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. E. S. Fisk was convicted of violating the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Daw, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
At the November term of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, an indictment containing four separate counts was returned against the plaintiff in error, E. S. Fisk. Each count charges him with a violation of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Law (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q).
The first count charges the defendant with selling to A. J. Anderson ten ounces of morphine and five ounces of cocaine without having registered with the collector of internal revenue of the United States, and without having paid the special tax required by law. The second…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Robinson v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Tuckerman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- United States v. ReisenweberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Schmeller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.