Legal Opinion

Myers v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKemp, J.

— This is an action to recover a balance of $8494.68, alleged to be due for clearing timber, etc., within the Bagnell Dam Reservoir area. Upon trial of the ease there was a verdict in favor of plaintiffs (respondents here) in the amount of $4500, from which judgment defendant (appellant here) duly appealed. The amended petition upon which the trial was had was in two counts — one based upon a contract providing a compensation of $40 per acre for said clearing, and the second count based upon quantum meruit. The first count of the petition, based on the'contract, was dismissed and the case was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Conant v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Byam v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Kirkland v. Bixby.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Myers v. Union Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WallingsfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Brady v. RapedoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API