Legal Opinion

Wolford v. Young

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1921No. 14273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. John H. Marshall, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

On January 29, 1887, James H. Barkley and his wife executed their separate wills. Each gave to the other the use, for life, of the property of the testator or testatrix, with the right to sell and convey and use the proceeds at will. Each named the other as executor or executrix, and all other provisions of the wills were identical. In each the remainder after the life estate was divided into eight parts, of which two were given to the children of Bernard Preble, a deceased brother of Mrs. Barkley, one to each of the three living sisters of Barkley, and three to the children of three deceased…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. CopenbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Nevitt v. WoodburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FountainIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Wolford v. YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API