Legal Opinion

Harnischfeger Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 9, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-C-179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

This is an action for declaratory relief arising under the Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4901-4918, and certain of the regulations enacted by the defendant Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), specifically, 40 C.F.R. Part 205, Subparts A and B, dealing with transportation equipment noise emission controls.

The plaintiffs are machine manufacturers. On February 9, 1979, plaintiffs were ordered by the defendant EPA, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 205.54, to perform noise emission control tests on certain types of mobile construction equipment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. YouakimSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Quern v. MandleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Curtis-Nevada Mines, Inc., and Robert CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Tex-Tow, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kucharek v. HanawayDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  2. Plumbers Local No. 75 v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. Plumbers Local No. 75 v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API