Harnischfeger Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for declaratory relief arising under the Noise Control Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4901-4918, and certain of the regulations enacted by the defendant Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), specifically, 40 C.F.R. Part 205, Subparts A and B, dealing with transportation equipment noise emission controls.
The plaintiffs are machine manufacturers. On February 9, 1979, plaintiffs were ordered by the defendant EPA, pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 205.54, to perform noise emission control tests on certain types of mobile construction equipment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. YouakimSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Quern v. MandleySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sandra K. Rucker, Herbert Rucker, Cheryl Dunham, Etc., and James Dunham v. Wabash Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Curtis-Nevada Mines, Inc., and Robert CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Tex-Tow, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kucharek v. HanawayDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1989
- Plumbers Local No. 75 v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Plumbers Local No. 75 v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992