State v. Doe
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge.
The state appeals from the district court’s order affirming the magistrate’s denial of restitution for medical expenses. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The state filed a petition alleging Doe was within the purview of the Juvenile Corrections Act and that on June 28, 2005 he had committed aggravated battery by striking C.L. “in the face and/or head with a tire iron.” Doe entered an Alford 1 plea, admitting he had struck C.L., but denying he had used a tire iron. The magistrate accepted Doe’s plea and scheduled a restitution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BybeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Jerry Allan HillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. CardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. StreetNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Donald Leonard HouserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. Lloyd Hardin McNeilIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.