Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1DissentPeterson, J.
I disagree with the majority on two points. I would hold that the trial court erred in admitting the Consumer Product Safety Commission documents. Second, I believe that due process requires post-verdict review beyond that which the majority finds sufficient (which, essentially, is no post-verdict review).
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is a federal “independent regulatory commission” created by Congress to regulate consumer products, by protecting the *290public against unreasonable risks of injury associated with consumer products, assisting consumers in evaluating the comparative…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Rader v. Gibbons and Reed CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Johnson v. Amerco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.