Main v. Procknow
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Winnebago county: O. D. Cleveland, Judge. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action at law upon contract the defendants appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the county court of Winnebago county: O. D. Cleveland, Judge. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in an action at law upon contract the defendants appeal. April 27, 1901, the parties entered into a contract in writing for the purchase of certain jewelry by the defendants from the plaintiffs, particularly specifying the articles, and providing, among other stipulations not relevant here, (1) that plaintiffs would furnish without charge to defendants a show case wherein to exhibit such jewelry; (2) would guarantee a profit of $50 on the purchase, which amounted…
1Opinion of the CourtTiaiLiN, J.
The objections contained in the letter of the buyers of May 1st were wholly insufficient and unavailable against a written contract of sale deliberately entered into and signed on April 27th which described goods and prices in detail. That contract was not to furnish goods suitable or salable in Oshkosh, or low priced goods or goods containing any proportion of rings “gentlemen’s sizes,” but was to furnish the goods described therein at the prices therein specified. The first shortage of goods having been made good at the re*282quest of tbe buyers, this is also out of tbe case. Tbis leaves only…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Nelson v. CarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1815
- Wheeler v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Sanger v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
- Hendricks v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Badger State Lumber Co. v. G. W. Jones Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Malueg v. Hatten Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909