Legal Opinion

Malueg v. Hatten Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Shawano •county: JohN GoodlaNd, Circuit Judge. Action to recover on a contract for a claimed balance for sawlogs sold defendant by plaintiffs at a stipulated price. Defendant answered putting in issue plaintiffs’ claim as to the agreed price for the logs and as to there being a balance due.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Shawano •county: JohN GoodlaNd, Circuit Judge. Action to recover on a contract for a claimed balance for sawlogs sold defendant by plaintiffs at a stipulated price. Defendant answered putting in issue plaintiffs’ claim as to the agreed price for the logs and as to there being a balance due. It pleaded as a defense that, for the purpose of supplying its mill with a stock of sawlogs for the manufacturing season, of 1906, it contracted in writing with, plaintiffs to cnt into sawlogs and deliver to it at a specified place, during the winter of 1905…

1Opinion of the CourtMabshall, J.

This case is ruled by a few familiar legal-principles.

Keeping in mind the conceded fact that respondents-hreached the contract in question by neglecting to deliver -to-appellant all the saw timber standing upon the land manufactured into sawlogs, properly scaled, by the close of the-logging season of 1906, the first principle to he mentioned is that a person, at law, may of right breach his contract with another and subject himself to the burden of such damages-for the benefit o£ such other as may he necessary to remedy the breach. Ward v. Am. H. F. Co. 119 Wis. 12, 96 N. W. 388.

It follows…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guetzkow Bros. v. A. H. Andrews & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Gross v. HeckertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Richardson v. ChynowethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Kelley, Maus & Co. v. La Crosse Carriage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hill v. ChipmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foss v. HeinemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lincoln v. Charles Alshuler Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Haueter v. MartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. German American Bank v. Webster Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Rhinelander Paper Co. v. BushmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API