Legal Opinion
Pigford v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2004No. CIV.A.97-1978(PLF), CIV.A.98-1693(PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
The Court has before it two motions for reconsideration of the Court’s June 2, 2003 Opinion and Order denying plaintiffs’ motion for relief for four groups of claimants who filed petitions for Monitor review. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motions, defendant’s response, plaintiffs’ reply and defendant’s surreply, the Court concludes that both motions for reconsideration must be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 14, 1999, this Court approved and entered a Consent Decree in these consolidated actions that was designed to bring resolution and finality to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Susan D. Goland and Patricia B. Skidmore v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- In Re General Motors Corporation Engine Interchange LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pigford, Timothy v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Austin v. DonahoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Pigford, Timothy v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Pigford, Timothy v. Johanns, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005