Legal Opinion

Wade v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 28, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Judge Reagan. Thomas-superior court. June-20, 1904.

1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.

Exceptions of fact to an auditor’s report are for a jury in the superior court; exceptions of law are for the court. Whether, in the absence of exceptions of. fact, the court can, without submitting the case to a jury and without rereference to the-auditor, frame a decree at variance with the facts reported by the auditor, is a question not involved in this case. “ When "there is an error of law apparent on the face of the auditor’s report wholly irrespective of the evidence on which it is based, then the court can correct that error by its judgment.” Brinson v. Wessolowsky, 57 Ga. 143;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brinson v. WessolowskySupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  2. Anderson v. UsherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Holton v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Owen v. S. P. Richards Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Carr v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Selman v. FaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API