Legal Opinion

Adler v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 2898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Logan County'; A. H. H list on, Judge. Action by Felix Adler for mandamus to Tom Jenkins. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Plaintiff in error seeks in this proceeding to have determined: (1) The legality of the election for the adoption of the charter of the city of Guthrie; (2) the validity of the election held by virtue of the terms of said charter for the election of municipal officers; and (3) that the mayor of said municipality under the charter form of government has no authority to appoint a successor to the plaintiff in error until after the expiration of the term of office to which he had been elected, and for that reason there was no vacancy in the office of city treasurer at the time the defendant in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lackey v. State Ex Rel. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Mitchell v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. People ex rel. Fowler v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Crook v. People ex rel. JayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Boyd v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Streat v. VermilyaMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Opinion No. (1989), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API