Legal Opinion

Poe v. Department of Revenue of the State, Motor Vehicle Division

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1993No. 92CA1477PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

Plaintiff, Kirk Poe, appeals from the district court judgment affirming the revocation of his driver’s license by the Department of Revenue for refusing to submit to testing as required by the express consent law. We affirm.

Evidence at the revocation hearing established the following facts. Plaintiff was the driver of a vehicle involved in a rollover accident which occurred at 6:30 p.m. on October 30, 1991. Plaintiff was thereafter taken to a hospital for treatment of the head and leg injuries he sustained in the accident.

The arresting officer first questioned plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Charnes v. BoomSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Dolan v. RustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Hancock v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Alford v. TiptonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gallion v. Colorado Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Brodak v. ViscontiColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Dike v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Tate v. Colorado Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Pierson v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API