Tate v. Colorado Department of Revenue

Opinion by:

Judge CASEBOLT.

Paul Tate (petitioner) appeals the district court judgment affirming the revocation of his driver's license by the Department of Revenue (Department) for refusing to submit to testing as required by the express consent statute. Because petitioner's procedural arguments challenging the Department's revocation action are unpersuasive, we affirm.

Petitioner was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol on March 18, 2004, and he then refused to submit to alcohol testing as required. Consequently, the arresting officer served a notice of revocation on petitioner…