Legal Opinion

York v. El-Ganzouri

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 2004No. 1—03—0222, 1—03—0259 consPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

Defendants, Abdel Raouf El-Ganzouri, M.D., his anesthesiology practice group, University Anesthesiologists, S.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Dr. El-Ganzouri), and Rush Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center (Rush), appeal from a $12,598,591 medical malpractice judgment entered against them and in favor of plaintiff, James York, M.D., pursuant to a jury’s verdict. On appeal, Dr. El-Ganzouri contends that the trial court’s time limitation on voir dire, and effective preclusion of the use of Dr. York’s day-in-the-life video by the voir dire time restriction, precluded him from…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Simmons v. GarcesIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. First Springfield Bank & Trust v. GalmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Moller v. LipovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. White v. Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Mansmith v. HameeduddinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Perkey v. Portes-JorolAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API