Legal Opinion
Yeager v. Hackensack Water Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 14, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-3195PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.
This matter arises out of the drought emergency which has affected many New Jersey residents since early this year. Plaintiffs are residential customers of defendant Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack), living within the affected area. 1 Defendants are Hackensack; Governor Thomas H. Kean; Commissioner of Environmental Protection Robert E. Hughey; Drought Coordinator Richard T. Dewling; and the State of New Jersey. Hackensack is a private water company engaged in supplying water to 60 municipalities under terms and conditions approved by the New Jersey Board…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Krebs v. RutgersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Doe v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Aronson v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- Freeman v. Koerner Ford of Scranton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.