Legal Opinion

Wallace v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1923No. 3800PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was convicted upon an indictment charging him with bribing Taylor, a deputy United States marshal, to permit Wallace to bring intoxicating liquor into Tennessee in violation of the Reed Amendment (39 Stat. 1069 [Comp. St. ■1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 8739a]). The case was a. compan*973ion one to those discussed in the opinions this day filed in the cases of Tuckerman et al., where the general facts are more fully stated.

Only two substantial questions arise here- which are not sufficiently discussed in some of the accompanying opinions. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Starr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  3. Sandals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  4. Theisen v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. J. C. Shaffer & Co. v. West Tennessee Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  4. Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Wilkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API