Legal Opinion
Romer v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 5, 1995No. 94SC140PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
We granted certiorari before judgment to review Board of County Commissioners v. Romer, No. 93CV3671 (Denver Dist.Ct. Jan. 13, 1994),1 pursuant to C.A.R. 50.2 The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County (Board) holding that the Board’s twenty percent payment is a “subsidy” within the meaning of article X, section 20(9) of the Colorado Constitution and that social services programs have been “delegated” to the counties within the meaning of section 20(9). The petitioners, Roy Romer in his official capacity as Governor of the State of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weaver v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Submission of Interrogatories on Senate Bill 93-74Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RSSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Colorado Common Cause v. BledsoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Romer v. BD. OF COM'RS, WELD COUNTY, COLO.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State v. BD. OF COM'RS MESA COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State ex rel. Norton v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Romer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.