Cude v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 99 years.
Appointed counsel on appeal raises two grounds of error, which he argues together. It is asserted that appellant was denied a fair trial and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at his trial. In support of these two grounds of error counsel lists 34 items “as examples of why and how [appellant] was denied a fair trial and the effective assistance of counsel.”
The right to effective assistance of counsel means counsel reasonably likely to render and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Albrecht v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Ex Parte PriorCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ewing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Vessels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Ex Parte DuffyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ingham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hawkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Ex Parte CruzCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hathorn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.