Legal Opinion

Bujalski v. Flockhart Foundry Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 7, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 N.J. Super. 249 (1951)

84 A.2d 468

HELEN BUJALSKI, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR ALEX KULINKA, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,

v.

FLOCKHART FOUNDRY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 29, 1951.

Decided November 7, 1951.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Frank Fink argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James J. Carroll, attorney).

Mr. Alexander Avidan argued the cause for appellee (Messrs. Avidan & Avidan and Miss Sara M. Lewitt, attorneys).

2Per curiam

The judgment under appeal is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions and for the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  2. Kulinka v. Flockhart Foundry Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Jochim v. Montrose Chemical Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Reynolds v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  5. Ritchie v. FarrellyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tlumac v. High Bridge StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. State v. ProvetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Olivera v. Hatco Chemical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. O'REILLY v. Roberto Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API