Kincaid v. State

1. The accused challenged the "array of jurors put upon him, on the ground that the jury had heard the evidence introduced against one of the other persons jointly indicted with him and alleged to have been in the same game. This did not dis*684qualify the entire panel of jurors, but if the accused desired to test the competency of any particular juror, it should have been done by a challenge to the poll. Quinlan v. State, ante, 669 (79 S. E. 768). In the present case the trial judge fully guarded the right of the accused, by putting each of the jurors upon his voi dire and asking him the…