Carnes v. Bray

1. There was some evidence to authorize the verdict found for the claimant.

2. The court did not err in refusing a new trial to the plaintiff in fi. fa. on the ground that a previous verdict in favor of the claimant, later *386set aside by the grant of a new trial, was allowed to go out with the jury in the second trial, the prior verdict being written upon the claim, and no request or motion for its concealment or exclusion being made by the plaintiff in fi. fa. or his attorney. See Keefer v. Pinion, 11 Ga. App. 843 (76 S. E. 648); Kincaid v. State, 13 Ga. App. 683 (3) (79 S. E. 770). This ruling…