Legal Opinion

Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Fentress

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 17, 1932No. 4793-4798PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Each of the two original suits was brought for the avowed purpose of obtaining the appointment of receivers, who in turn were to. protect the property from loss through sale under the present unfavorable conditions, which are alleged to be abnormal. The In-sull Utility Investments, Ine., it appears, was a corporation, commonly described as a holding company, organized for the purpose of speculating in stocks, chiefly utility, issued by companies which were controlled or manipulated by a group of men in Chicago headed by one Samuel…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  3. Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Montfort v. KorteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  4. Fuhrman v. United America InsurorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Brooklyn Nat. League Baseball Club v. PasquelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API