Legal Opinion

Lietz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 15, 1995No. 92-04655PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Judge.

Edmond Francis Lietz appeals from his convictions and sentences for two counts of grand theft. Lietz’s appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After an independent review of the record and the law, we see no error affecting his convictions and therefore affirm. We remand, however, to strike certain conditions of probation not orally pronounced and to strike two improperly imposed costs.

First, the trial court imposed special conditions of probation but failed to announce these conditions at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. George v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Roberson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API