Legal Opinion

DiDonato v. Wortman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1986No. 8526SC1015PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a viable child en ventre sa mere who dies as a result of a third party’s negligence may obtain civil redress under our wrongful death statute, G.S. 28A-18-2. On appeal, plaintiff has apparently abandoned his analogous non-statutory claim for “wrongful deprivation of life.”

The Supreme Court has not passed directly on the question before us. In Gay v. Thompson, 266 N.C. 394, 146 S.E. 2d 425 (1966), the court reserved the question, but held that the speculative nature of damages required dismissal of plaintiffs action. The court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bobek v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Azzolino v. DingfelderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Gay v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Cannon v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DiDonato v. WortmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API