Legal Opinion

United States v. Jiminez

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 20, 2002No. 01-4488Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Appellant Francisco Jiminez petitions this Court pro se to vacate the judgment of the District Court sentencing him to ten years in prison. Also before us is the motion of his trial attorney, Rena Rothfeld, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), to be relieved as counsel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the District Court and grant Rothfeld’s motion.

Coconspirators Juan Henao and Edwin Gomez approached Jiminez on October 18, 2000, to enlist his services as a “henchman” during a sale of a little over a kilogram of…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Mohamed Youla, A/K/A Mohamed Fofana Mohamed YoulaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API